Showing posts with label books - cross of redemption. Show all posts
Showing posts with label books - cross of redemption. Show all posts

Friday, February 26, 2021

reading review - the cross of redemption

I've mentioned this collection, which includes essays, articles, and talks spanning a range of nearly four decades, at various points over the past few months - in August, about grammar; in December, about American traditions; and on Tuesday, when I highlighted my favorite chapter from the book. The logical conclusion of all this attention is that I thought highly of the book; the oddsmakers tracking the TOA Book of the Year board would be advised to place it among the favorites.

The Cross of Redemption by James Baldwin (October 2020)

The pieces in this collection are not of the same standard associated with Baldwin's acclaimed work, though I hardly mean to suggest that these are rough drafts - it's more like the difference between a studio album and a concert performance. The quality I enjoy in live recordings comes through at times in this collection - I see the artist working rather than see the artist's work, and one of the rewards of this read is discovering the connection between a given topic and the larger themes of both this and Baldwin's work. But what I'll remember about The Cross of Redemption ten years from now was my realization that this collection spoke with more clarity and insight about 2020 than did most of what I read or heard throughout the year.

TOA Rating: Four out of four

In addition to the previously linked essay, I reread "Sidney Poitier" from this collection. The book was also fruitful in terms of recommended reading - I added both Soledad Brother by George Jackson and Daddy Was a Number Runner by Louise Meriwether to my future reading list. My book notes are here.

Tuesday, February 23, 2021

the essay of the year

In my book notes for James Baldwin's The Cross of Redemption, I wrote that the chapter "The Artist's Struggle for Integrity" was (perhaps) the best essay I read all year. I don't have any formal mechanism for tracking this sort of thing; I suppose I'll just take my word for it.

The essay in question was originally delivered as a talk in the fall of 1962. Based on a quick search online, it seems like the talk is posted in its entirety. Those who prefer to read about it (but remain unwilling to open the collection mentioned above) can check out this post about it on Brain Pickings.